Remembering Your Learning – The Torah Way: Adapted from the Torah of Rav Yitzchok Hutner, zt”l (Pachad Yitzchok, Shavuous Maamar 30)
Adapted
By Eliakim Willner
Eliakim Willner is author of “Nesivos Olam – Nesiv HaTorah: An Appreciation of Torah Study”, a translation with commentary of a work by the Maharal of Prague, published by Artscroll/Mesorah. He is currently working on a continuation of the Nesivos Olam series, “Nesivos Olam – Nesiv HaAvodah: The Philosophy and Practice of Prayer”.
Section 1 – “Let” Versus “Put” Torah in the
Heart
In the
first chapter of the Shma prayer the verse states (Devarim 6:6), “Let these matters (devarim) that I command you today be
upon your heart”, while the parallel verse in the second chapter of Shma
(Devarim 11:18) uses different wording: “Place these matters (devarai) of
mine upon your heart and upon your soul”. [The “matters” that both this verse
and the one in the second chapter deal with refer to the study of Torah.]
Notice that while the first chapter speaks in terms of “Let… be upon your heart”,
the second chapter speaks in terms of “Place… upon your heart”. Why the change
in language?
We
have dealt with this issue elsewhere (Pachad Yitzchok, Shavuos Maamar 25)
but we revisit it here to focus on a new angle that we did not consider before.
Section 2 – The Positive Commandment to Remember One’s Torah
Targum
Yonasan translates
the “Let these matters that I command you today be upon your heart” verse as “Let
these matters that I command you today be inscribed upon the tablets of your
hearts”. The Gaon, Rav Yitzchok Zev Soloveitchik of Brisk explains in
his Torah commentary on parshas V’eschanan that this verse establishes a positive commandment to remember
the Torah that one learns. This commandment reinforces the prohibition (Devarim
4:9), “…lest these things depart from your heart, all the days of your life…”,
which our Sages explain in Avos 3:8 as a warning not to forget even one
detail of one’s Torah learning. The Gemara in Menachos 99 in fact
enumerates this as one of the negative commandments.
The “Let
these matters that I command you today be upon your heart” verse adds the
additional dimension of a positive commandment to this obligation, making it
clear that failing to continually give Torah knowledge its rightful place in one’s
heart, assuring that it not be forgotten, is a binding positive requirement.
This,
Rav Soloveitchik explains, is the underlying intent of Targum Yonasan’s choice
of words, “be inscribed upon the tablets of your hearts”. We are enjoined with a
positive commandment to remember the Torah we learn, and not to forget it. Rav
Soloveitchik elaborates upon this point in depth; refer to his commentary for
additional detail.
Section 3 – Two Approaches to Remembering
We know
from experience that there are two approaches to defeating forgetfulness. The
first approach is through a thorough review of the topic that one wants to
remember. The second approach is a function of the impression the topic makes
when it is first encountered. The more intense the initial impression, the less
likely it is that the mind will let it go. When we absorb an idea that we know
is essential, that we know matters deeply, it is practically impossible for the
Forces of Forgetfulness to hold sway.
These
two approaches to defeating forgetfulness are the foundation for the two
approaches for remembering one’s Torah study – letting the matters rest
on the heart, and placing the matters on the heart – that are mentioned
in the first and second Shma chapters. Reinforcing one’s memory by placing
on the heart implies an ongoing, active effort to retain the knowledge learned,
and the only way to do that is via strenuous review. However, reinforcing one’s
memory by letting matters rest on the heart means that the effort to retain
the material is front-loaded; it takes place when the material initially enters
the consciousness, and after that one need only let the memory persist.
Section 4 – Learning, to Retain
We have
often discussed the concept of our Sages, cited in Yerushalmi, Brachos 1:5,
that the Shma verse is an affirmation of the first two of the ten commandments,
dibros. When we say, in Shma,
“Hashem is our G-d” we are affirming the first of the ten dibros, “I am
Hashem, your G-d”. When we say, “Hashem is one” we are affirming the second of
the ten dibros, “You should not recognize the gods of others”. The
second commandment is “You should not recognize the gods of others in My
presence”. When we say, “Hashem is one” (“one” in this context means “one and
only”) we are affirming that commandment.
This concept sheds additional
light on the words of Rabbeinu Yonah, who says that the Shma
verse encapsulates the content of the entire first Shma chapter; the
rest of the chapter merely details what is entailed in the acceptance of Hashem’s
Kingship expressed by the first verse. Refer to Rabbeinu Yonah’s statements
in detail, in Shaarei Teshuva, 3:22.
In light of the concept of
our Sages that the Shma verse is an affirmation of the first two of the ten
commandments, “I am Hashem, your G-d” and “You should not recognize the gods of
others”, it follows that, per Rabbeinu Yonah, the entire first chapter is
a reflection of the context of the first two dibros, since those two dibros
are the first chapter’s subject matter.
So, what was the context of
the first two dibros? According to our Sages as expressed in Medrash
Rabbah, Shir HaShirim 1:2, “When Yisroel heard ‘I am Hashem, your G-d’ and ‘You
should not recognize the gods of others’, the Torah became engraved upon their
hearts and what they learned was not susceptible to being forgotten” (except
that after the transgression of the golden calf their newfound ability to retain
their learning permanently, was lost).
The context of the first two
dibros, then, which is reflected in the first Shma chapter, is an
initial impression on the mind that is so intense that it cannot be forgotten.
Now, how would we go about
replicating, in our small way, the experience of “learning that cannot be forgotten”
by “engraving” the Torah on our own hearts? Surely that path to remembering
does not entail the labor of reviewing! Reviewing over and over is a far cry
from the “engraved upon the heart” path to not forgetting that we briefly attained
at Sinai!
Rather, if we want to replicate
that experience in ourselves, our only option is to focus on the learning
experience itself, and to strive mightily to give maximum depth of meaning to the
Torah we are learning, when we first are learning it; when it is first being absorbed
in our souls. In that way, and only in that way, we may achieve, at least in
some measure, the Sinaitic experience of engraving the Torah on our hearts. To
the extent that we succeed, we will have a taste of the learning and the permanent
remembering that we briefly enjoyed in full measure when we heard the first two
dibros at Sinai.
Section 5 – Two Parallel Paths to Avoiding Torah Forgetfulness
The relationship
our Sages taught us between Shma and the first two dibros applies
only to the first Shma chapter. The second Shma chapter is a
general acceptance of the mitzvos. We are now able to understand the reason
for the “let” versus “place” difference between the first two Shma chapters.
Certainly, the respective verses in both chapters parallel each other; they
both deal with how to avoid forgetting one’s Torah learning. But they each deal
with the issue in a manner befitting the context of the containing chapter.
The context of the first chapter
is the first two dibros and in that context the path to avoiding Torah
forgetfulness is intensity of acquisition and subsequent “let”. The context of
the second chapter, however, is general acceptance of the mitzvos and in
that context the antidote for Torah forgetfulness is “place” – active reinforcement
of the learning through review.
Section 6 – The Double Benefit of Passionately Learning
Torah
There
is another aspect of the first Shma chapter’s “let” method for
forestalling forgetfulness that is worth mentioning. It should be obvious that
in order to achieve the level of intensity required to acquire Torah such that
it will not be forgotten, the acquisition must be accompanied by a bounty of
joy from the very moment that new Torah material enters the consciousness. The
soul must delight in the bliss and sweetness of the words of Torah, because to the
extent that we feel joy in our Torah learning, to that extent is the Torah is absorbed
in our minds and not forgotten. Now, the Rambam in Sefer HaMitzvos (Mitzvos
Asei 3), when discussing, ways to fulfill the mitzva of loving Hashem,
states that the enjoyment and pleasure that a person derives from the word of
Hashem (i.e. Torah study), is itself a fulfillment of the mitzva to love
Hashem. Study this Rambam carefully.
This
adds additional perspective to our understanding of the first Shma
chapter. The chapter enjoins us to “love Hashem, your G-d…”, which, as the Rambam
taught us, we can accomplish with a surfeit of joy, an abundance of pleasure
and an appreciation of the sweetness that we derive from our Torah learning.
But
these are the same factors that cause the Torah to stick powerfully in our minds
at the time we learn it. This is the “let” method of remembering our learning!
It is no surprise, then, that the very next verse is, “Let these matters
which I command you today be upon your heart – studying Torah with the passion
required to fulfill the mitzva of loving Hashem – is at the same time a
fulfillment of the mitzva to remember our Torah study using this Shma
chapter’s “let” method. Understand this well.
No comments:
Post a Comment