Wednesday, November 13, 2024

HaGaon Rav Shlomo Chai David Yitzchak Halioua, zt’l, Rosh Yeshiva of Yeshiva Rabbeinu Chaim Berlin

By Eliakim Willner

It is impossible to encapsulate in writing an individual of the caliber of Rav Shlomo Halioua. However, the emotions rise up and spill over, and it is also impossible to remain silent in the face of the unspeakable tragedy of his untimely petira. I’m sure that many others with qualifications far greater than mine will have words of tribute and homage; chizuk and nechama, but the following are the words that emanate from my own heart. I also draw on the testimony of the maspidim at the levaya, and others with whom I communicated personally, who were profligate in their praise of Rav Shlomo.

This is a tribute that, in my worst nightmares, I never expected to write. It is barely a few hours since the shocking news broke of Rav Shlomo Halioua’s petira, and barely two weeks since the Yeshiva Rabbeinu Chaim Berlin oilam-at-large understood that the Rosh Yeshiva wasn’t well. In fact, he had been ill for some time but few people were aware of his condition. With incredible mind-over-matter kochos – reminiscent of the kochos of his revered shver, Rav Aharon Schechter, zt’l – he soldiered on, delivering shiurim and shmuesen in his usual carefully thought out and meticulously crafted way.

Only very recently did it become evident that his strength might have been waning. At times he sat during davening when he would ordinarily have been standing. Yet, on Rosh HaShana he took the time and made the effort to give personal brachos to the large tzibur that went to be mekabel ponim by him after davening. On Chol Hamoed Sukkos he delivered his usual insightful Maamar and joined in the simcha with a smile on his face.

When we heard that he was hospitalized with an infection toward the end of Chol Hamoed, we weren’t shocked but neither were we alarmed. After all, the Rosh Yeshiva was a relatively young man and infections were treatable.

Only in the last week did the seriousness of the situation hit us. The change in atmosphere in the Yeshiva was palpable. Tehillim were recited with great fervor during the last days of yom tov, at every opportunity in the Yeshiva – before leining, after davening, before hakafos – and a large chabura forewent the pre-hakafos kiddush and said Tehillim again, b’tzibur.

His brother-in-law, Rav Sendrovitz, tore the heavens as he led the tzibur in Tehillim after Shachris on Sunday morning. But we were not zoche to reverse the gezaira and the bitter news reached us shortly after 2:00pm Sunday afternoon, chof-hai Tishrei.

His Ascension to Rosh Yeshiva

As Rosh Yeshiva, Rav Shlomo had huge shoes to fill; much of the oilam remembered Rav Hutner zt’l and of course everyone had vivid and immediate memories of Rav Aharon Schechter, zt’l. Rav Aharon hand-picked Rav Shlomo, his son-in-law, as his successor and it is safe to say that Rav Aharon fully expected Rav Shlomo to strike a balance between maintaining the traditions and minhagim of Yeshiva Chaim Berlin, while striking out on his own path, to meet the changing needs of the times.

This was no mean feat, but Rav Shlomo was up to the task. The “old-timers” continued to feel at home in the Yeshiva but Rav Shlomo “tweaked” as necessary to accommodate the dispositions of today’s bochrim. For example, Rav Shlomo instituted “in Shabbosos” for the younger Bais Medrash bochrim to encourage camaraderie and to build their kesher to the Yeshiva. He gave the younger bochrim a greater role in organizing and managing the Leil Shabbos and weekday sidrei ha’tefillos. He was mechazek sedorim on erev Shabbos and on Shabbos kodesh itself.

Rebbe-talmid relationships have always been very strong in the Yeshiva, but Rav Shlomo strengthened them even further by traveling to Eretz Yisroel to meet with the Yeshiva Rabbeinu Chaim Berlin bochrim learning there. He strove to relate to each bochur on an individual level, in the Yeshiva Rabbeinu Chaim Berlin tradition established and maintained by Rav Hutner and Rav Schechter.

The Early Years

Rav Shlomo was the son of Rav Avrohom Halioua, zt’l, a choshuver talmid chochom who became a Rav in Flatbush after emigrating from Morocco, and of Masoda bas Jamilla (who passed away only hours after Rav Shlomo’s petira and who whose aron joined that of Rav Shlomo outside the Yeshiva so that the massive oilam gathered for Rav Shlomo’s levaya could be melave her, as well).

Rav Shlomo Halioua’s abilities became known at a young age. Rav Shlomo Mandel, Rosh Yeshiva of the Yeshiva of Brooklyn, told me that he saw Rav Shlomo Halioua’s potential when he was yet a young student at that yeshiva. He later learned by Rav Paler zt’l, by Rav Faivel Cohen zt’l and in the Brooklyn Yeshivas Mir, before coming to Yeshiva Rabbeinu Chaim Berlin, where he became very close to the Rosh Yeshiva, Rav Aharon Schechter, soon becoming his son-in-law. He developed and maintained a close kesher with Rav Yaakov Drillman, Rosh Yeshiva of the Novardok Yeshiva.

Rav Shlomo’s gadlus in all miktzo‘os of Torah was legendary. He was a masmid from his early years; a boki in, among other things, shas, rishonim, acharonim; Maharal and Ramchal and other machshova seforim, and in inyonei tefilla. He was also a tremendous baal chesed – but always, in all areas, with the comportment of a true hatznaya leches.

His memory was incredible; it was said of him that talmidei chachomim could engage with him on any topic and he had that topic on his fingertips.

His Relationship with Rav Aharon Schechter

Rav Aharon relied on Rav Shlomo and often consulted with him on both Yeshiva and klal matters, especially in Rav Aharon’s later years. He trusted Rav Shlomo to represent him in meetings of senior Roshei Yeshiva, when Rav Aharon himself was unable to attend. Rav Aharon knew that although Rav Shlomo was an independent thinker, his and Rav Shlomo’s minds ran along similar paths, so to speak, and ultimately focused on achieving the same objectives.

A major factor in Rav Shlomo’s decision making process, even after Rav Aharon’s petira, was “How would Rav Aharon have responded to this question?” or “How would Rav Aharon have handled that situation?”

Middos and Hanhagos

Rav Shlomo was soft-spoken but firm on matters of principle and did not hesitate to hold his ground in those areas. He was adamant that once a proper course was identified, it would be adhered to.

My personal encounters with Rav Shlomo were limited, but despite the fact that he was eons above me in every respect, he related to me, as he did to most people he interacted with, as an equal. He had the rare quality of genuine humility; he never “spoke down” to anyone because he didn’t think of himself as “up”. He never lost sight of the individual and was sensitive to every person’s feelings, even as he focused on larger issues of the Yeshiva and the tzibur.

I once consulted him about an idea I had for a certain project. A conversation with him was always a pleasant affair; he was easy-going, had a sense of humor, and, aside from the matter I approached him about, was genuinely interested in what was going on in my life.

Although he immediately grasped all the implications of the idea, both positive and negative, he told me that he wanted to think about it and asked that I return a few days later for a response. When I did return he advised an approach that accentuated the positive implications of my project while downplaying the negative ones. Despite the sharpness of his intellect, he followed the dictum of chazal to not be hasty in deciding questions with halachic implications.

The Levaya

The hespedim were heartfelt and filled with much specific toichen about Rav Shlomo, and they held the oilam in their grip throughout. Sometimes the bochrim of today are described as cold or unfeeling but the wails and the wrenching sobs that rose, specifically from his many talmidim, during the hespedim, made it clear that this wasn’t so, at least with respect to the feelings of his talmidim for Rav Shlomo.

The maspidim were, in order of appearance, Rav Chaim Kitevits, R”M in the Yeshiva, Rav Yosef Halioua, Rosh Kollel Gur Aryeh, Rav Tzvi Fink, a son-in-law, the Lakewood Rosh Yeshiva, Rav Malkiel Kotler (all shlita), Reb Boruch Halioua; sons-in-law Reb Yitzchok Aharon Shonek and Reb Yehuda Herzka, Reb Avrohom Halioua, Reb Yaakov Halioua, Reb Refoel Halioua, Chaim Tzi Halioua, Eliyahu Halioua; Rav Eliyahu Yormark, Rav Yitzchok Meir Sendrovitz and Rav Avigdor Kitevits (all shlita).

Much of what was said has already been covered in this tribute and it would take reams of paper to even summarize the hespedim, worthwhile as they were, in full. I will present various additional points that the maspidim brought to the fore, largely without specific attribution, since many of the points were raised by multiple maspidim.

Rav Chaim Kitevits noted that Rav Shlomo could be referred to as being comparable to a malach Hashem, in his single-minded concern for his talmidim and for the hatzlocho of the Yeshiva.

The family and the Yeshiva were all made yesomim by the petira of Rav Shlomo, in that we are bereft of the Torah that he might have transmitted, but which will no longer be available to us.

Rav Shlomo, inherently a private person, had a mokom mutzneh, a secluded portion of his intellect that was continually active in learning – analyzing, asking, answering and fine-tuning his understanding of sugyos. It wasn’t unusual for him to give the appearance of “returning to earth” from his own private world when someone approached him with a question.

His approach to learning defies typical darchei limud; it was described as “top-down”, ending in new havanos, and it became clear, after-the-fact, that these havanos emanated from the specific wording of the sugya under study.

Rav Shlomo was compared to a maayan hamisgaber that was always rooted in oilam haba and which will remain connected to his talmidim even as he himself now inhabits oilam haba.

Rav Shlomo was noteworthy for his yishuv hadaas, his bitachon and his menuchas hanefesh – his serenity, all of which lead to his perpetually exuding simcha.

As mentioned, few knew that the Rosh Yeshiva was ill for over a year prior to his petira. But the illness did result in his occasional absences from the Yeshiva for treatments and the like, so minyanim in the Yeshiva and shiurim were missed, and this was bound to raise eyebrows. Someone suggested that perhaps he should make his illness known, to avoid exciting comment by his absences. He responded that he feared that people would be reluctant to approach him with their personal or  klal issues if they knew he was ill, and he would rather have people think poorly of him than avoid availing themselves of his advice. Such was his self-sacrifice for the sake of the tzibur.

The point was made several times of his extreme zehirus in shmiras ainayim and in his dibbur. He was meticulous to never speak or listen to anything remotely approaching loshon horah. Rav Shlomo did not drive and, as related by Rav Avigdor Kitevits, he confided to a chaver that it was impossible to drive carefully without looking in all directions, and if he did that, who could tell what he might see? So he opted to be a passenger, who could avoid looking out of the car windows.

The Yeshiva had a difficult year, with the passing, first of the Rosh Yeshiva, Rav Aharon Schechter, zt’l, then with the passing of the Mashgiach, Rav Mordechai Schechter, zt’l, and now with the passing of Rav Shlomo, zt’l. As Rav Yormark said, “the wound that was beginning to close was ripped open”, and we, as a tzibur need to be mechazek ourselves. The Yeshiva had tremendous hatzlocho the past few zemanim and we are challenged to continue to rise to even greater heights.

As Rav Sendrovitz put it, on Simchas Torah we returned the sifrei Torah to the aron kodesh, and just two days later, Rav Shlomo was returned to his “aron kodesh” in shomayim.

But, Rav Chaim Kitevits emphasized, the Yeshiva will rise to even greater heights and the talmidim will continue to grow in Torah, avodah and yiras shomayim!

His Legacy

I had been looking forward very much to interacting with Rav Shlomo more over time. Alas, none of us will have that opportunity any longer. He was poised to make many and more significant contributions to the Yeshiva Chaim Berlin legacy as his leadership of the Yeshiva continued. Alas, that is also not to be. But even during his short tenure as Rosh Yeshiva he has left a substantial mark and that mark will endure, and be a significant foundation for his successor to build on, iyH, as the Yeshiva continues to thrive and flourish – as it is sure to. That will be Rav Shlomo’s everlasting legacy. Yehi zichro baruch.

Friday, May 10, 2024

A Deeper Appreciation of a Well-Known Ramban on Mitzvos that are Zecher L’Yitzias Mitzraim Adapted from the Torah of Rav Yitzchok Hutner, zt”l (Pachad Yitzchok, Chanukah, Reshima)

A Deeper Appreciation of a Well-Known Ramban on Mitzvos that are Zecher L’Yitzias Mitzraim Adapted from the Torah of Rav Yitzchok Hutner, zt”l (Pachad Yitzchok, Chanukah, Reshima)

By Eliakim Willner

Eliakim Willner is author of “Nesivos Olam – Nesiv HaTorah: An Appreciation of Torah Study”, a translation with commentary of a work by the Maharal of Prague, published by Artscroll/Mesorah. A continuation of the Nesivos Olam series, “Nesivos Olam – Nesiv HaAvodah: The Philosophy and Practice of Prayer”, and an adaptation of a collection of Pachad Yitzchok Maamorim for an English-speaking audience, are currently awaiting publication.

Before we present Rav Hutner’s insightful appreciation of the words of the Ramban we will quote this seminal Ramban directly, in free translation. The Ramban appears at the end of parshas Bo (Shmos 13:16).

The Ramban

“I now present a principle that will explain numerous mitzvos.

“From the time that idol worship began spreading throughout the world, in the days of Enosh, people began to develop corrupted faith ideas. Some denied the existence of a Creator and maintained that the world always existed. Some denied Hashem’s omniscience saying, ‘How does Hashem know, and is there knowledge in the Most High?’ (Tehillim 73:11). Others acknowledge His omniscience but deny his active direction of world affairs, claiming that man and beast are equal in that Hashem does not watch over them, does not reward or punish them and does not care what happens in the world.

“When Hashem chooses a group or an individual and performs miracles that depart from the natural order on their behalf these false ideas are discredited for all to see. Open miracles demonstrate that there is a G-d in the world who created it from nothing, who knows what transpires in it, who watches over His creations and who is omnipotent. Moreover, when the miracle is predicted in advance by a prophet it further demonstrates that there is truthful prophecy and that Hashem communicates with man and reveals his secrets to His servants, the prophets. This in turn demonstrates the veracity of the Torah. …

“Thus, open miracles and signs are clear proofs to the principles of our faith in Hashem and to the entirety of the Torah.

“And since Hashem will not perform signs and miracles in every generation, and in the presence of every evil person and scoffer, He has commanded us to continually make commemorations and remembrances to these miracles that we witnessed with our own eyes and to pass a record of these events to our children, and they to their children, and so on until the final generation. And Hashem was very stringent on this matter, as we see from the fact that excision was decreed upon those who consume chometz or neglect the korban Pesach

“There are many other mitzvos that are commemorations of the Egyptian exodus and the purpose of all of them is that there be, in all generations, support for the principles of our faith through these never-to-be-forgotten miracles, and so that there shall be no opening for scoffers to deny these principles of faith.

“Thus, a person who purchases a mezuzah for pennies,  and affixes it to his doorpost, and has in mind its purpose, implicitly acknowledges that Hashem created the world, is aware of what transpires in it, actively supervises it, communicates to prophets; and he also implicitly acknowledges his belief in all the fundamentals of the Torah – and, moreover, he demonstrates at the same time that Hashem is benevolent in the extreme to those who fulfill his will, as can be seen from the fact that He delivered us from slavery to freedom and to great honor, in the merit of our forefathers, who chose to serve Him…

And in acknowledging open and public miracles, a person is at the same time acknowledging hidden miracles, which are the foundation of the entire Torah, for a person has no claim to any part of the Torah of Moshe if he does not believe that all our affairs and all our events, whether transpiring to groups or to individuals, are themselves miracles, not results of nature or predetermination.

“Rather, if a person fulfills the mitzvos his reward will be success, and if he violates them his penalty will be excision, all in accordance with Hashem’s will…”

The Pachad Yitzchok’s Understanding of The Ramban

What does it mean to say, in such strong terms, that mundane events are actually miracles? This is the focus of the Pachad Yitzchok’s discussion, as follows.

In his well-known commentary at the end of Parshas Bo (Shmos 13:16), the Ramban writes that open miracles enable us to appreciate that what appears to be the “natural order” is actually just as miraculous, albeit in a non-obvious way. Open miracles demonstrate that Hashem is continually aware of what transpires in the universe and maintains full control over all events, large and small. However, for reasons the Ramban explains, Hashem prefers to keep his “choreography” obscure, except in exceptional circumstances, hiding His involvement in what appears to be laws of nature. He concludes with the statement that anyone who does not believe that all apparently natural events are in reality “stealth miracles” has utterly rejected the Torah of Moshe.

Let us examine the inner workings of the relationship between open miracles and the stealth miracles that are commonly referred to as natural law, as defined by the Ramban.

By definition, the laws of nature take the form of limits. In the physical world infinity is a concept, not a reality. Things and events have start and end points and quantifiable measurements. Limits stand in opposition to the Ohr Haganuz, the primordial light that marked the onset of the creation process; the light about which it is said that (Chagigah 12a), “with it, man could see from one end of the universe to the other”. The light of the first day of creation is a supernatural, spiritual light that exists independently of any heavenly bodies (which had net yet been created). Hashem hid it away for a future time so that it would not be used by the sinful generations that would soon ensue. Since this light is infinite, the concept of “limit” does not apply to it and it is thus not subject to natural law, which is, as we said, bound by limits.

The Ohr Haganuz was hidden away for the righteous, in the world-to-come. (See Rashi on Beraishis 1:4, citing Beraishis Rabbah 3:6) It is important, though, for seekers of the deeper layers of meaning that underlie the words of chazal to clearly understand that when chazal say about a thing that it was “hidden away” the intent is not to convey that for all practical purposes it ceases to exist in the here-and-now.

It is a fallacy, for example, to think that when chazal teach us (See Shekalim 6:1; Yoma 53b) that the Aron, the ark of the covenant, was hidden away, they mean to imply that the world is the same with the Aron hidden as it would be if the Aron did not exist at all. If the Aron exists, it is certain that there are here-and-now implications to its existence, albeit that it is hidden. Rather, “hidden” means that the effects of the Aron’s existence prior to its being hidden are different from the effects after it was hidden. Prior to its being hidden, the effects of the Aron’s existence were overt and perceptible. After it was hidden its effects are also hidden; they are veiled and obscured. (See Pachad Yitzchok, Shavuous, Maamar 26:14)

The same principle applies with respect to the Ohr Haganuz. Ordinarily it also makes its presence felt in the here-and-now, in a veiled and obscured manner. This is what we call “nature” – finite, and following predictable rules which limit physical behavior – for example, the law of gravity limits the direction in which an object can move; the law of momentum limits how far an object will travel when force is applied to it, and so on. It is in fact a reigned-in version of the Ohr Haganuz that provides the energy for the material world to function, albeit in the limited manner that it does. However, what we call a “miracle” and what we call “nature” are actually the same Ohr Haganuz working in two different ways. A well-placed, miniscule “puncture” in the fabric of the veil that, as a rule, hides the Ohr Haganuz, manifests itself as a suspension of the normally restrained behavior in the area where the puncture was made. For example, in the case of kriyas yam suf, water rose instead of seeking its level – its behavior when the Ohr Haganuz is veiled, as it usually is. We refer to this suspension of the veiling of the Ohr Haganuz as a “miracle”. When, however, the veil remains tightly sealed in all directions, then the Ohr Haganuz only functions in muted form, its full powers hidden, and we refer to this state of affairs as “nature”.

This is what the Ramban means when he writes that, in reality, nature is actually miracles in hidden form. He is saying that the very same Ohr Haganuz that powers miracles, actually powers the day-to-day events of nature. When the hiddenness is lessened that light produces miracles. When the hiddenness remains intact that light produces nature.

The Maamar is adding an important additional dimension to our understanding of the Ramban. Superficially the Ramban can be understood as merely saying that Hashem’s involvement in world (and individual) affairs is as real and intense when it is non-obvious (through natural law) as when it is blatant (through miracles). This is certainly true. However the Maamar additionally points out that it is actually the same force – the Ohr Haganuz – that powers both natural law and miracles, although functioning in different ways. Not only do natural law and miracles have the same divine Author, they are both implemented using a common medium – the Ohr Haganuz.