Some Thoughts בראנא
אסתר ב' ר' דוד ע"ה לעילוי נשמת
Whose yahrzeit was yesterday, שבת,י"ב ניסן
Unity
The בריח התיכון was an
interior cross-beam of cedar wood that went through the קרשים,
which formed the outer perimeter of the משכן.
חז"ל teach us that Yaakov אבינו
commanded the שבטים to plant cedar trees in Egypt
for the קרשים, but he himself took charge of
the בריח, personally bringing the wood
for it from ארץ ישראל.
The Maharal
explains that the קרשים represent the twelve שבטים of כלל ישראל;
there were 48 קרשים, 4 for each שבט.
The total length of the קרשים was 70 אמות,
the total number of כלל
ישראל
that went down to מצרים.
Yaakov was
the first of the אבות privileged to have all his
descendants become a part of כלל ישראל.
He is thus the force that brings unity to כלל ישראל.
The מדה of Yaakov is אחדות.
The בריח, which held the קרשים together,
symbolizes the unity of כלל
ישראל. It is thus
apropos that Yaakov, himself, supply the בריח.
We know that
מעשה אבות סימן לבנים and it is a fact that
throughout the generations, כלל
ישראל, and the
individual families within כלל
ישראל, maintained
an unusual degree of unity and cohesiveness, despite all the travails that we
were subjected to – צרות that usually lead to disunity
and fractionalization.
May we learn
from her example, and may she be a מליצה ישרה for her descendants, and for the entire
extended family.
The Art of Persuasion
When the
time came for Aharon to take over the עבודה
in the Mishkan, Hashem told Moshe, קח את אהרון,
take Aharon. Rashi explains that this means קחנו בדברים,
take him with words – in other words, convince him to accept the role.
The Maharal
explains that it is impossible to “take” a person by force; a person is defined
by his דעת, his mind, and no matter what
happens to a person physically, his דעת,
his opinion, is impervious to force. That is why, when acquiring an object by משיכה,
moving it, one can use a verbal summons to induce an animal to move, thereby
acquiring it – that counts as משיכה – but
one cannot acquire an עבד
כנעני that way.
When you summon a person, even if he obliges you by moving toward you, it is
because his דעת intervened and it is what he wants
to do. Your summons is not the direct inducement for his motion. Whereas an
animal does not exercise independent judgment to decide whether or not to
listen to you. Your summons directly caused the animal to move and that is
sufficient for a משיכה acquisition.
Bubby
Willner excelled in this מדה. She had well thought out
beliefs about what was right and wrong; appropriate and inappropriate. But she
did not attempt to foist them on others. Rather, she discussed and reasoned,
and accepted the other person’s decision with grace, even if their דעת
did not coincide with
her דעת. She acknowledged the autonomy
of her family members and the people around her and was content to make her
point and let them decide what they would do.
May we all
learn from Bubby’s example in our dealings with our own family members and
others, and may she be a מליצה
ישרה for her descendants, and for the entire
extended family.
No comments:
Post a Comment